Why it Matters
The House Education and Workforce Committee is set to mark up seven bills on March 17, 2026, in what amounts to a rapid-fire legislative sprint through some of the most contentious corners of education and workforce policy. The education bills 2026 package covers everything from cracking down on "ghost students" siphoning federal aid to restricting sexually oriented materials in schools — and even reaches into retirement plan litigation reform under ERISA.
The hearing, chaired by Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI-5) and scheduled for 2:15 p.m. in the Rayburn House Office Building, arrives after months of sustained lobbying from universities, financial firms, nonprofits, and at least one digital identity verification company. Five of the seven bills were introduced just five days before the markup on March 12, signaling that committee leadership moved quickly to queue them up.
What's on the Docket at the House Education Committee Markup
The seven bills break into three rough clusters: student aid integrity, K-12 content and curriculum, and a pair of outliers touching scholarship governance and retirement law.
Student Aid Fraud and FAFSA Overhaul
Three bills form a coordinated package targeting waste and fraud in federal student aid:
H.R. 7892, the No Aid for Ghost Students Act of 2026, would amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to create an identity fraud detection system designed to prevent federal dollars from flowing to fictitious enrollees.
H.R. 7891, the Student Aid Fraud Oversight and Accountability Act of 2026, would strengthen oversight mechanisms and potentially impose penalties on institutions found to have participated in aid fraud.
H.R. 7893, the FAFSA Verification Efficiency Act, takes the other side of the coin — streamlining the FAFSA verification process to reduce administrative burden on students and schools while maintaining program integrity.
Together, the trio reflects a growing bipartisan frustration with the mechanics of federal student aid — a system that has been plagued by both bureaucratic inefficiency and outright fraud.
K-12 Content and Curriculum
Two bills target what children encounter in the classroom:
H.R. 7661, the Stop the Sexualization of Children Act, introduced February 24 by committee Vice Chair Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL-15), would prohibit the use of federal funds for materials that sexualize children in schools. This is the most publicly contentious bill on the agenda. QNotes Carolinas reported that the bill "aims to bar LGBTQ-related material in schools, sparking ALA backlash and raising fears of new book bans." The American Library Association and civil liberties groups have pushed back, arguing the bill could be used broadly to restrict LGBTQ+ books and educational content.
H.R. 7890, the Science of Reading Act of 2026, would amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to exclude certain instructional approaches — such as "three-cueing" — from comprehensive literacy instruction and prioritize evidence-based, phonics-centered reading methods. This bill has historically attracted bipartisan interest, as reading proficiency concerns cut across party lines.
The Outliers
H.R. 7894, the Truman Scholarship Clean House Act, targets governance reforms at the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation.
H.R. 6084, the ERISA Litigation Reform Act, proposes changes to how lawsuits are brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act — a bill that has drawn heavy lobbying from the financial services industry.
The Lobbying Landscape Behind the House Education Workforce Committee Hearing
The education workforce legislation on this agenda did not materialize in a vacuum. Lobbying disclosure records from the past four quarters reveal sustained engagement from a range of stakeholders.
ERISA reform drew the heaviest lobbying activity. T. Rowe Price Group filed in multiple quarters across 2024, and the American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries filed in the Fourth Quarter of 2025 — consistent with escalating financial industry interest as the bill advanced. Eight of ten lobbying filings on ERISA reform came in 2025, the highest concentration of any bill on the hearing agenda.
On child safety, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children filed lobbying disclosures in three consecutive quarters in 2025 — the Second, Third, and Fourth Quarters — signaling sustained, high-priority engagement on H.R. 7661.
The student aid fraud bills attracted lobbying from higher education institutions including St. Louis University and Ball State University, which filed across multiple quarters in 2024. On the FAFSA verification front, Socure Inc. — a digital identity verification company — filed in the Third Quarter of 2025, reflecting private-sector technology interest in how the government authenticates student identities.
For the Science of Reading Act, the National Association of Independent Schools filed in consecutive quarters with lobbying amounts in the $50,000–$60,000 range per filing — notably higher than most other organizations on this hearing's lobbying map.
PAC Contributions to Congress Tell a Narrower Story
Most organizations lobbying on these bills — universities, nonprofits like NCMEC, and the American Jewish Committee — are legally prohibited from operating federal PACs. But two organizations that surfaced in the lobbying data do maintain active political action committees.
Adtalem Global Education, a for-profit higher education company that lobbied on student aid fraud oversight, operates a PAC that has contributed to both Democrats and Republicans across multiple election cycles, with individual contributions ranging from $1,000 to $2,500. Recipients include members serving on committees with education and healthcare workforce jurisdiction.
Discovery Communications (now Warner Bros. Discovery), which filed lobbying disclosures on the Student Aid Fraud Oversight Act, runs the WBD PAC with a uniform $1,000-per-recipient giving strategy targeted primarily at Senate Commerce and House Energy and Commerce Committee members — not Education and Workforce members directly.
Neither PAC showed direct contributions to members of the Education and Workforce Committee in the available data, suggesting the lobbying influence on this congressional hearing March 2026 is flowing through advocacy and direct engagement rather than campaign dollars.
What to Watch
The hearing has no listed witnesses, which — combined with the "General" hearing type designation — suggests this is structured as a legislative markup rather than a traditional witness-testimony hearing. That means the committee could move these bills to a vote relatively quickly.
The political fault line to watch is H.R. 7661. With advocacy groups already mobilizing against it and GovTrack assigning it only an 11 percent historical likelihood of clearing committee, the markup will test whether Republican leadership can hold its coalition on a bill that has already become a cultural flashpoint.
The student aid fraud package, by contrast, may find smoother bipartisan footing — addressing a problem that both parties have acknowledged without the ideological baggage that attaches to content restrictions in schools.
Ranking Member Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA-3) and Vice Ranking Member Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX-35) will lead the Democratic response. How aggressively they engage on the children's content bill versus the student aid measures will signal where Democrats see the most political risk — and opportunity — heading into the rest of the 119th Congress.
Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.