Why it Matters

Millions of older Americans are being pushed back into the labor market by financial necessity — and once there, many report facing entrenched age discrimination that limits their opportunities. The Senate Special Committee on Aging is convening a seniors workforce hearing on March 25, 2026, to examine the challenges older adults face in employment at a moment when the data paints a stark picture: nearly a quarter of workers age 50 and older say they feel pushed out of their jobs, even as employers struggle to fill positions left vacant by retiring Baby Boomers.

The hearing, chaired by Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) with Ranking Member Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), arrives amid a wave of research and reporting that has turned "unretirement" into one of the defining labor market stories of 2026. The stakes extend well beyond individual workers — how Congress responds could shape retirement policy, age discrimination law, and the nation's ability to address a deepening labor shortage.

The "Unretirement" Wave Driving the Seniors Workforce Hearing

The backdrop for this Senate Aging Committee hearing is a labor market in flux. According to CNBC reporting, 48 percent of older Americans returning to work cite financial necessity or a poor economic outlook as their primary reason. Only 15 percent point to boredom, and 14 percent say they want to stay active.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that the labor force participation rate for workers aged 75 and older will exceed 10 percent by 2026. An AARP survey from February 2026 found that 7 percent of retirees had returned to work in the prior six months, up from 6 percent in earlier surveys — a trend that is accelerating.

Carly Roszkowski of AARP framed it bluntly in a CNBC interview: "This idea of retirement as a cliff, where we're all working towards this one day where we finally get to retire, is really not the reality for so many people in this country."

Rising living costs and insufficient retirement savings are compounding the pressure, making older workers employment a front-burner economic issue rather than a niche concern.

Age Discrimination: The Other Side of the Seniors in the Workforce Story

Even as economic forces drive seniors back to work, many encounter significant barriers once they get there. A major AARP Research survey released in March 2026 found that:

  • 33 percent of workers age 50 and older said employers assume they are less tech-savvy
  • 24 percent reported assumptions that they are resistant to change
  • 20 percent said their accomplishments and expertise go unacknowledged
  • 20 percent noted younger employees are given preference for training opportunities

A companion LinkedIn and AARP report found that workers age 50 and older are "essentially closing the tech gap" with younger peers — suggesting the stereotypes are not supported by the data.

Forbes has reported that age bias is becoming an unavoidable issue for employers as demographic shifts accelerate and the workforce grows significantly older. And syndicated reporting from WFSB and KPTV in mid-March highlighted how financial pressure, age discrimination, and shifting cultural attitudes are collectively reshaping what retirement looks like.

The Labor Shortage Angle and Aging Workforce Policy

The hearing also touches on a macroeconomic reality: employers need older workers. Site Selection Magazine identified the mass retirement of Baby Boomers as the single greatest workforce challenge of 2026, noting their departure is "leaving behind a workforce whose numbers are not keeping pace with the U.S. population."

RAND Corporation researchers have argued that older workers could be the solution to rural America's labor crisis, stating that states like West Virginia should be doing "everything they can to encourage older workers to fill those jobs." That research is based on one of the most in-depth surveys of American workers ever conducted.

This creates a policy tension the committee will likely explore: the economy needs seniors in the workforce, but the workplace often fails to accommodate or welcome them.

A Sustained Committee Focus on Older Workers Employment

This is not the committee's first pass at the issue. The Senate Special Committee on Aging previously held a hearing titled "Protecting Older Americans: Leveling the Playing Field for Older Workers" during the current congressional session, signaling that aging workforce policy is a sustained priority for both Scott and Gillibrand.

On the legislative front, H.R. 3522, the Protecting Older Workers Act, has been introduced in the House. The bill would amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 to clarify standards for federal employment discrimination cases — a measure directly relevant to the themes the committee has been examining.

Lobbying Activity Around the Seniors Workforce Hearing

Two organizations with direct stakes in the hearing's subject matter have been active on the lobbying front over the past year.

The American Seniors Housing Association filed lobbying disclosures in the First Quarter of 2025, Third Quarter of 2025, and Fourth Quarter of 2025 — each reporting $50,000 in spending — covering topics related to seniors housing and aging.

The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE) filed disclosures covering retirement, federal employment, and age-related benefits through the Third Quarter of 2025, before filing a termination in the Fourth Quarter of 2025.

On the campaign finance side, NARFE-PAC made a $5,000 contribution to Gillibrand for Senate during the past two years, a notable connection given Gillibrand's role as ranking member on the committee overseeing this hearing.

The Hearing Details

The hearing is scheduled for March 25, 2026, at 7:30 p.m. in 216 Hart Senate Office Building. The committee's 15 members include several senators with direct constituent stakes in the issue — from Sen. Jim Justice (R-WV), whose state RAND researchers specifically flagged as needing older workers, to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ), both of whom sit on the Democratic side.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article