Why It Matters

The Subcommittee on Workforce Protections will convene Wednesday, July 22 to examine how the Biden-Harris Department of Labor (DOL) shared sensitive investigative files with plaintiffs' attorneys in class action suits, a practice that may have circumvented normal oversight protocols. An Office of Inspector General (OIG) audit issued June 30 found that DOL lacked adequate controls for disclosing confidential information through agreements that gave outside law firms access to sensitive enforcement material. The hearing comes as Republicans control both chambers and are examining the prior administration's institutional practices, and the case raises questions about balancing support for workers' legal claims against protecting the integrity of government investigations.

The Big Picture

The controversy centers on how three DOL divisions, the Employee Benefits Security Administration, the Office of the Solicitor, and the Wage and Hour Division, handled confidential investigative material. Rather than release information through standard Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) channels, the agencies used "common interest agreements" to share data directly with outside counsel in pending litigation. The mechanism allowed attorneys suing employers on behalf of workers or plaintiffs' classes to access investigative findings without the transparency mechanisms typically built into document disclosure.

The OIG audit, requested by the Committee on Education and the Workforce, found that DOL failed to establish sufficient policies, coordination, or tracking mechanisms governing how the three agencies entered into these arrangements with outside groups.

The complaint is not new to this Congress. In November 2024, then-Committee Chair Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) raised concerns about DOL's practices, with the committee stating the "Biden-Harris DOL is Abusing its Authority." Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI) followed in January 2025, when he sent a formal letter to DOL Inspector General Larry D. Turner renewing the request. That pressure led the inspector general to launch the audit that produced the current findings, which Walberg said at the time would show serious bureaucratic misconduct if the allegations proved true.

The Bottom Line

The upcoming hearing marks the first public airing of the audit's findings, and lawmakers are likely to press DOL leadership on the eight corrective recommendations the OIG issued, including calls for written policies, conflict-of-interest safeguards, and a centralized tracking system the department currently lacks. Rep. Ryan Mackenzie (R-PA) chairs the panel.

The hearing's title, "Broken Trust: How the Biden-Harris DOL Leaked Confidential Information," signals how Republicans intend to frame the episode not as a policy dispute but as a breach of trust warranting formal accountability. The proceedings will also test whether findings driven largely by career-staff practices are enough to translate into lasting legislative or regulatory change at DOL under the Trump administration.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article