Why it Matters

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has identified eight priority recommendations that remain open at the Department of Education (DOE), and the department has implemented one since GAO’s last review. GAO says priority recommendations are unresolved items that warrant special attention because addressing them can save money, improve decision-making, reduce mismanagement, and ensure programs comply with the law.

The report matters because it points to areas where DOE still needs to improve oversight and program management across major federal education functions. Congress is likely to follow the department’s progress closely because these letters are GAO’s way of tracking whether agencies are acting on previously identified fixes.

The Big Picture

GAO’s Priority Open Recommendations letters track recommendations agencies have not yet implemented. For Education, the latest letter says GAO identified eight priority recommendations in May 2025 and added three more in June, bringing the total to ten after one was resolved. The updated list includes federal student aid, protecting sensitive information, and financial risks tied to charter school management organizations.

The letters are part of GAO’s authority under 31 U.S.C. § 717 to evaluate government programs and recommend ways to assess performance. They go to agency heads and are national in scope, so they function as an accountability tool for federal departments rather than a report aimed at any one state or district.

The Bottom Line

DOE now has 10 priority open recommendations from the GAO, including three added in June, covering federal student aid, protecting sensitive information, and financial risks tied to charter school management organizations. The report gives Congress and the DOE a current checklist of unresolved issues, and it will likely come up in future oversight work as lawmakers review how the handles recommendations are being handled.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article