Why it matters
The House Financial Services Committee's Housing and Insurance Subcommittee convened a congressional hearing roundup on March 26, 2026, examining why a small subset of repeatedly flooded properties is driving the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) toward insolvency . Congress is exploring if it can do anything about the program to keep it solvent as its authorization expires September 30.
The Trump administration, which rolled back federal floodplain standards on its first day in office, is on a collision course with a bipartisan congressional push to tighten restrictions on the program's costliest properties.
The Big Picture
The NFIP carries more than $20 billion in debt to the U.S. Treasury — a hole driven substantially by "severe repetitive loss" (SRL) properties that flood again and again. A GAO report released the day before the hearing found FEMA had implemented only four of nine GAO recommendations on flood mitigation. That unfinished business landed squarely on the witness table.
This hearing is the second major NFIP-focused session in two weeks. On March 13, the full committee examined draft reauthorization legislation. Three draft bills were submitted for the record of this subcommittee session: H.R. 6256, the Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act; a bill to bar newly designated SRL properties from NFIP coverage; and the Community Flood Resilience Act. The September 30 reauthorization deadline falls five weeks before the November midterms — making inaction politically costly for both parties.
What They're Saying
Five witnesses brought distinct and sometimes conflicting perspectives to the hearing:
Alicia Puente Cackley, Director, U.S. Government Accountability Office provided the audit backbone, drawing on GAO-26-109045 to document FEMA's incomplete compliance with prior reform recommendations.
Diane Horn, Specialist, Congressional Research Service offered neutral legislative context on NFIP structure and the consequences of another program lapse.
Steve Ellis, President, Taxpayers for Common Sense — a veteran of a prior 2017 House hearing on NFIP reform — has argued that the federal government's practice of subsidizing below-cost insurance for repeatedly flooded properties represents an unacceptable taxpayer burden.
Joel Scata, Senior Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council has documented that more than 250,000 properties have filed repeated NFIP claims — and that nearly half have received more in insurance payments than their homes are worth.
Samantha Medlock, Managing Partner, Climate Risk Advisors brought private-sector risk modeling expertise, including the economic case for upfront mitigation investment.
The fault line was predictable but sharp. Ellis and the fiscal hawks pushed the most aggressive proposal — barring newly designated SRL properties from NFIP coverage entirely, forcing market discipline on the program's most expensive addresses. Scata and the environmental advocates pushed back: exclusion without buyout alternatives simply abandons vulnerable homeowners, many of them low-income.
Hearing Statements Summary: Political Stakes
For the Committee Chair
Rep. Mike Flood (R-NE-1), who chairs the subcommittee, warned during a 2025 government shutdown that NFIP disruption would mean "no new flood insurance contracts will be issued." That concern for program continuity shapes his approach: Flood wants structural reform, but not a chaotic collapse. He is positioning himself as the lead architect of NFIP reauthorization in the House — a significant legislative legacy opportunity with a hard deadline.
For Coastal Republicans
Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R-NY-2) co-introduced the bipartisan FLOAT Act last year, offering a $1,000 annual tax credit for flood insurance premiums. Rep. María Salazar (R-FL-27) announced $25.6 million in FY26 flood mitigation funding for her district just weeks before the hearing and co-introduced the bipartisan Shelter Act — a 25 percent disaster mitigation tax credit — with Rep. Brittany Pettersen (D-CO-7). Both represent flood-exposed districts where premium increases or coverage restrictions could cost them their seats.
For the Administration
The Trump administration rolled back floodplain management requirements on Day 1 and has governed the NFIP through a series of short-term extensions rather than structural reform. The GAO's finding that FEMA implemented only four of nine mitigation recommendations puts Republican committee members in the awkward position of pressing their own administration's agency for non-compliance.
House Committee Hearing: The Other Side
Democrats on the subcommittee are not simply defending the status quo. Six Democratic members — including Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO-5), the Ranking Member, and Rep. Nikema Williams (D-GA-5), who co-led the effort — signed a December 2024 letter demanding that Congress pre-approve buyouts for SRL properties and update FEMA's flood maps. That letter previews the Democratic line: support reform, but fund relocation assistance before pulling the coverage rug out from under struggling homeowners.
Rep. Sylvia Garcia (D-TX-29) has been among the most engaged members on this issue. Her Houston-area district was hammered by Hurricane Harvey and subsequent storms, giving her constituents a direct stake in how Congress resolves the repetitive-loss problem.
Capitol Hill Testimony and What's Next
The September 30, 2026 reauthorization deadline is the forcing function. H.R. 5484, the National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2025, is already in the pipeline and includes provisions targeting multi-structure mitigation and buyout refusals. The three bills examined at this hearing are expected to be folded into or considered alongside that broader reauthorization vehicle.
The National Association of Realtors has warned that an NFIP lapse would freeze real estate transactions in flood zones nationwide — a pre-election catastrophe neither party wants to own.
The Bottom Line
Congress has held this hearing, in various forms, for two decades. Now there is a midterm deadline and a $20-billion debt so the pressure to finally act is higher than it has ever been.
Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.
Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article