Why It Matters

The National Fraternal Order of Police faces a fundamental challenge: securing legislative protections while navigating contradictory federal priorities. Congress shows strong bipartisan support for law enforcement—from expanded concealed carry rights under the LEOSA Reform Act to collective bargaining protections—yet federal funding for police operations faces significant cuts. With officer assaults reaching a 10-year high and suicide rates 54% above the general population, the FOP’s advocacy centers on proving congressional action can address measurable threats to officer safety, even as broader federal support erodes.

By the Numbers

The National Fraternal Order of Police reported $100,000 in lobbying expenditures this quarter, conducted entirely in-house by a six-person team. The FOP has filed 77 disclosures since 2003 with total spending exceeding $5.8 million.

Veterans James O. Pasco Jr. and Timothy M. Richardson have represented the FOP since 2003. Mark D. McDonald joined in 2019, bringing prior Hill experience from Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick’s office. Newer additions include Laura Gormally (2024) and Benjamin H. Stokes (May 2024).

The FOP maintains consistent spending patterns, prioritizing in-house capacity over external firms while focusing on the same core issues for over two decades.

The Agenda

The National Fraternal Order of Police is lobbying on over 60 bills across key law enforcement priorities:

  • Labor Rights: The Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act (H.R. 1505 & S. 636) guaranteeing collective bargaining rights
  • Firearms: The LEOSA Reform Act (S. 679 & H.R. 2243) expanding concealed carry for qualified officers
  • Officer Safety: Anti-fentanyl trafficking bills (H.R. 27 & S. 331) and Protect and Serve Acts creating federal penalties for assaulting officers
  • Benefits: Tax relief for overtime pay (H.R. 405) and World Trade Center Health Program funding (H.R. 1410 & S. 739)

These priorities have remained remarkably stable since 2003, reflecting the organization’s long-term strategic focus.

Broader Context

Congress is actively advancing law enforcement priorities. The Senate Judiciary Committee recently advanced eight bipartisan bills supporting officer mental health and fentanyl protections. FBI data showing 85,730 officer assaults in 2024—a 10-year high—strengthens FOP advocacy for federal penalties.

However, contradictions persist. While Congress demonstrates bipartisan backing, the Trump administration cut approximately $500 million in federal funding to public safety programs in April 2025, affecting police training and wellness initiatives. The FOP’s agenda aligns with congressional focus on mental health support and de-escalation training, while the National Association of Police Organizations lobbies on nearly identical priorities.

Between The Lines

The LEOSA Reform Act has already passed the House, with members like Rep. Nick LaLota publicly celebrating the victory. House Appropriations prioritized DEA fentanyl efforts and increased Byrne Justice Grant funding.

Not all terrain favors police interests. The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act proposes limiting qualified immunity—provisions the FOP would likely oppose. Allied advocates include VirTra Inc., backing de-escalation training requirements, creating additional pressure for accountability measures.

Competitive Landscape

The FOP operates alongside allied organizations pushing identical priorities. The National Association of Police Organizations pursues the same core bills—collective bargaining rights, concealed carry expansion, and federal assault penalties. The Fraternal Order of Police U.S. Park Police Labor Committee focuses on federal officer compensation through the Park Police Modernization Act.

This coalition creates significant leverage, amplifying messaging and increasing pressure during a receptive legislative moment.

The Bottom Line

The FOP’s lobbying reflects consistent, decades-long advocacy on officer interests. Operating in a favorable congressional environment with bipartisan support for key priorities like the LEOSA Reform Act, the organization faces a complex landscape where legislative victories coexist with federal funding constraints and contradictory executive actions. Coordinated lobbying from allied organizations amplifies the police message but also highlights how narrow these wins may prove without sustained funding commitments.

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article