Rare Bipartisan Push on Russia Stuns Washington—Here's Why

The Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia Act of 2026 has quickly emerged as one of the Senate's most bipartisan measures of the 119th Congress.

S. 5025, the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia Act of 2026, was introduced on July 16 by Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Darline Graham (R-S.C.). The legislation was referred to the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee and launched with more than 60 bipartisan cosponsors, including Republican and Democratic senators honoring the late Sen. Lindsey Graham's work on the legislation.

The legislation has attracted support from Republicans including Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), as well as Democrats including Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.).

What S. 5025 Does and Who It Affects

The legislation would impose new sanctions and other economic measures targeting Russia and those supporting its war against Ukraine.

According to Sen. Blumenthal, the bill would impose "bone-crushing" sanctions on major purchasers of Russian oil and gas, including China, India and Brazil.

The revised legislation would also sanction Russian officials, financial institutions and Russia's "shadow fleet" while authorizing tariffs of up to 100% on the largest purchasers of Russian energy, replacing an earlier proposal that would have imposed tariffs of up to 500%. The bill also provides the president with waiver authority under certain circumstances.

Why Republicans Are Backing Russia Sanctions

Sen. Ted Cruz endorsed the legislation, calling for it to be renamed the Lindsey Graham Russia Accountability Act and urging its passage.

Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) argued on the Senate floor that the legislation would help "bankrupt Putin's war machine" by increasing economic pressure on Russia and its energy customers.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), who chairs the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, has also advocated stronger sanctions targeting Russia's shadow tanker fleet. On Sept. 19, 2025, Cotton said: "Russia is using its shadow fleet to evade sanctions, sell cheap oil to Communist China, and fund Putin's war machine. Tightening sanctions on these illicit vessels will strengthen our economic and national security."

Sen. Katie Boyd Britt (R-Ala.) said the legislation would provide President Donald Trump with an additional tool to pressure Russia and pursue a negotiated end to the war.

The Democratic Coalition and Their Demands

According to Sen. Blumenthal, the legislation is the product of months of bipartisan negotiations and now has broad support from both parties as well as backing from the White House.

Sens. Mark Kelly, Jack Reed and Chris Coons have argued that requiring Ukraine to surrender territory while simultaneously lifting sanctions on Russia would undermine U.S. interests.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) has said that if President Trump does not impose additional sanctions administratively, Congress stands ready to move the Graham-Blumenthal legislation.

On July 8, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) also urged Congress to advance one of the bipartisan Russia sanctions measures pending before the Senate.

Departure From Past Positions

Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), for example, previously expressed cautious optimism about Russia-Ukraine negotiations in December 2025.

The legislation also carries significant symbolic importance as part of the late Sen. Lindsey Graham's legislative legacy. Britt's July 16 announcement emphasized that the bill honors Graham's longstanding support for Ukraine and his efforts to strengthen sanctions against Russia.

Administration Support Changes the Equation

In September 2025, Blumenthal, Graham, Shaheen and Wicker announced they had reached an agreement with the Trump administration on revised legislative language.

Before his death, Lindsey Graham also secured White House support for the updated legislation, significantly improving its prospects in Congress.

Looking Forward for Senate Russia Sanctions Legislation

S. 5025 now awaits action in the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee. With more than 60 bipartisan cosponsors and White House backing, supporters say the legislation is positioned for Senate consideration, though the timing of floor action remains uncertain.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article