What Happened

A public feud between Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Ed Martin, the Trump administration's DOJ Pardon Attorney, erupted on social media April 30 after Tillis announced he would apply what he called a January 6 litmus test to any future attorney general nominee. Politico's live updates blog first captured the exchange, which included Martin telling Tillis to "just go to Hell" and Tillis responding that "being hated by idiots is the price you pay for not being one of them."

Recap

The Martin-Tillis Republican dispute has roots in an earlier confirmation fight. Tillis had blocked Martin's nomination as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, citing Martin's advocacy for January 6 Capitol rioters and his work defending participants in the riot. Trump pulled Martin's nomination after it became clear he lacked the votes, and the president subsequently tapped Fox News personality and former prosecutor Jeanine Pirro for the role instead. Martin was then rehired to the Justice Department as Pardon Attorney.

The feud reignited when Tillis announced he would extend his opposition beyond Martin specifically, vowing to block any future attorney general nominee who excuses or minimizes the events of January 6, 2021. Tillis, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has the procedural leverage to prevent nominees from advancing to a full floor vote, giving his threat real teeth.

Tillis has offered a personal reason for his position. In the hours after a committee vote on April 29, he recounted being the last senator to leave the Senate chamber on January 6, as a mob of Trump supporters temporarily halted the Electoral College count. That personal account, reported by Politico, adds dimension to what might otherwise appear to be a purely tactical political stance.

Martin's response was sharp. He initially posted an attack from his official DOJ account before deleting it, then reposted from his personal account. In the post, he accused Tillis of saying that Ashli Babbitt, the woman killed during the January 6 riot, "deserved it" in front of six witnesses, including two Tillis staffers. He closed the message: "Instead back to North Carolina, just go to Hell. Good riddance. #DrainTheSwamp." Martin also accused Tillis of having called him to intervene in a pardon case on behalf of a constituent.

Tillis quickly clarified what that call was actually about. "Ed Martin is correct about one thing," Tillis wrote. "The 'constituent' I opposed pardoning was Greg Lindberg, who was convicted of defrauding North Carolinians to the tune of billions of dollars and attempting to bribe public officials." That detail, first clearly named by the Tampa Free Press, reframes Martin's allegation. Rather than Tillis seeking a favor, Tillis was opposing a pardon, which undercuts the narrative Martin was trying to construct.

The North Carolina Republican conflict between Tillis and the Trump administration is not new. Trump has previously posted on Truth Social hinting he might support a primary challenger against Tillis in the 2026 Senate race, according to the Carolina Journal, in direct response to Tillis opposing Trump's high-profile picks. Trump also posted on Truth Social urging the Senate to confirm Martin before the nomination collapsed, writing, "Ed is coming up on the deadline for Voting and, if approved, HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN."

Hill & Administration Take

Tillis's Jan. 6 litmus test raises immediate questions about Trump's next attorney general pick. Courthouse News Service reported that a Tillis spokesperson did not clarify exactly what kinds of January 6-related statements would be disqualifying for a future nominee, leaving some ambiguity about precisely where the line is drawn. The outlet also noted that Martin had opened an investigation into his own office's handling of January 6 prosecutions while serving as acting U.S. attorney, deepening the backstory of Tillis's opposition.

The administration's public response has come primarily through Truth Social. Beyond the posts on Martin's nomination, Trump announced the withdrawal of Martin's U.S. attorney nomination and the selection of Pirro via Truth Social, according to AP News.

What the Media Is Reporting

Coverage of the Martin-Tillis feud has surfaced several details beyond the original Politico account. Mediaite reported that Martin initially posted the "go to Hell" message from his official DOJ account before deleting it and reposting from his personal account, raising questions about the use of government resources for political attacks. The Washington Examiner identified the specific trigger for Martin's outburst as Tillis publicly questioning whether Martin was still employed at DOJ at all. Courthouse News framed the broader implications for Trump's next attorney general pick, noting that Tillis has a pattern of breaking publicly with the administration on major issues and that this episode fits a consistent independent streak rather than an isolated incident.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.