Why it Matters
Water infrastructure funding is central to Tampa Bay Water’s strategy after hiring Jones Walker LLP to increase federal appropriations for system upgrades and PFAS response. The firm brings a former House Appropriations Committee staffer, offering a direct pipeline to the committee that controls federal spending.
By the Numbers
Tampa Bay Water has lobbied federally since 2003 through multiple firms. Its current lobbying team includes:
- Corcoran Partners (2025–Present)
- Jones Walker LLP (October 2025–Present)
Previous firms include Dentons US LLP (2021–2025), DGA Group LLC (2022–2024), and Bose Public Affairs Group (2016–2021).
New Team
The new lobbying team lists Paul Ferrier Cambon and Marybeth Jeri Lamanna Nassif. Nassif’s recent House Appropriations Committee experience is a strategic asset for appropriations-focused advocacy.
Broader Context
Congress is focused on water infrastructure amid aging systems and water quality concerns, creating bipartisan interest. The Energy and Water Development appropriations bill (H.R.4553) and other measures underline funding pathways. Concerns about PFAS contamination and drinking-water protections intensify urgency for federal dollars. For background on federal programs and funding priorities, see the EPA’s water infrastructure resources at EPA Water Infrastructure.
The Agenda
The new client registration explicitly targets “increase funding for Tampa Bay Water infrastructure improvements” and is filed under the Budget/Appropriations issue code. Tampa Bay Water serves roughly 2.5 million people across six jurisdictions and operates groundwater, river, and desalination systems.
Competitive Landscape
Water utilities nationwide are competing for finite federal dollars. Peers active in Washington include the Great Lakes Water Authority, Denver Water, and Orange Water and Sewer Authority. This creates a crowded appropriations environment.
Between the Lines
Key bills and hearings shape the path for federal support. In addition to H.R.4553, S.2388 (Water Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2025) and SRF funding discussions are relevant. Members like Sen. Roger Marshall and Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick and Hillary Scholten have pushed for stronger funding of State Revolving Funds and PFAS removal programs. Recent hearings include House Transportation’s water infrastructure financing hearing and Senate Environment’s review of strengthening water infrastructure programs.
The Bottom Line
Tampa Bay Water made a timed hire: Nassif’s appropriations experience and Cambon’s Gulf Coast infrastructure track record give the utility a tailored team to pursue appropriations wins. With congressional appetite for water spending, the utility has an opening — but faces stiff competition from other large systems.
href="https://legis1.com/request-demo/”>Request a demo to learn more.
Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article