Why It Matters

A Congressional Research Service report published in August examines how the Economic Development Administration has evolved as Congress and successive administrations have expanded and redirected the federal government's economic development efforts. EDA remains the only federal agency with economic development as its exclusive mission, supporting state and local efforts to grow businesses, create jobs and expand investment in economically distressed areas.

The agency is also facing significant uncertainty. The Trump administration proposed eliminating EDA in both its fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027 budget requests, even though Congress reauthorized the agency in January 2025 and authorized $3.2 billion over five years for certain EDA programs and expenses.

A central policy debate is whether federal economic development assistance should remain flexible enough to address a broad range of local challenges or increasingly target particular communities, industries and national priorities. The report notes that congressional debate preceding EDA's latest reauthorization centered in part on modernizing the agency to address changing technologies and industries versus maintaining broad-based programs that can adapt to different economic challenges and opportunities.

The Big Picture

EDA was created over 60 years ago under the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to support economic development in distressed communities. During its first three decades, EDA primarily supported industrial and commercial development through infrastructure, public works, business loans, planning assistance and related investments. Congress later expanded its portfolio to include regional innovation, workforce development, supply chains, access to capital and technology-based economic development.

In January 2025, P.L. 118-272 reauthorized EDA for the first time since Congress last amended and extended its authorities in 2004. The law established EDA's investment priorities in statute, revised cost-sharing and other program requirements, prioritized certain small, rural, under-resourced and tribal communities, and expanded the agency's roles in disaster recovery and tribal economic development. It also authorized new programs and expanded EDA's ability to support activities including broadband, workforce training and project predevelopment.

The reauthorization reflected congressional interest in both preserving EDA's flexible core grant programs and expanding the types of communities and economic challenges they can address. The changes included provisions aimed at rural, small and tribal communities, as well as areas experiencing economic distress related to changes in the energy and manufacturing industries.

EDA's grant programs generally operate through competitive processes that solicit community-directed proposals aligned with statutory investment priorities. Those priorities include critical infrastructure, workforce development, innovation and entrepreneurship, economic recovery and resilience, and manufacturing. Many programs remain flexible enough to support multiple activities, including infrastructure, workforce development and planning.

The agency has also undergone an organizational restructuring. EDA announced implementation of a reorganization plan that reflects new programs and offices created through its reauthorization. The restructuring includes the Office of Tribal Economic Development and Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience, both required by the reauthorization law, as well as a new Office of Grants Management. EDA's six regional offices remain in place.

Technology-based economic development has become an increasingly prominent part of EDA's portfolio. The agency's Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship administers programs including Build to Scale, Regional Technology and Innovation Hubs and Recompete. Congress has increasingly supported policies designed to strengthen regional competitive advantages through innovation clusters and similar initiatives since the 2000s.

The Trump administration has also sought to use EDA for artificial intelligence workforce development. The administration's Artificial Intelligence Action Plan directed the Department of Labor, Department of Education, National Science Foundation and Department of Commerce to prioritize AI-related skills development through relevant education and workforce funding streams.

The Bottom Line

Congress faces competing questions over EDA's future even after lawmakers recently reauthorized the agency. The reauthorization demonstrated continued congressional support for using flexible economic development grants to promote job creation and private investment in distressed communities while also expanding EDA's ability to address newer challenges involving technology, workforce development, disasters and industrial transitions.

At the same time, critics have questioned whether federal economic development programs duplicate other government efforts or intrude on responsibilities better handled by states, local governments and the private sector. Some critics have called for federal economic development assistance programs to be eliminated entirely.

The Trump administration's proposal to eliminate EDA therefore puts its budget priorities at odds with Congress' recent decision to reauthorize and expand the agency. If Congress accepted the administration's proposal, it would eliminate the only federal agency whose exclusive mission is economic development.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article