Why it Matters
The House Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies is set to hold an EPA budget hearing on April 28, putting the Trump administration's environmental spending priorities under congressional scrutiny at a moment when the agency's role, reach, and resources are all in flux. The hearing arrives as the administration has moved aggressively to reshape federal land management, relocate agencies, and roll back environmental regulations, making the question of what Congress will fund — and what it won't — consequential for millions of Americans who depend on clean air, clean water, and public lands.
The Policy Landscape
The subcommittee is navigating a federal environmental agenda in active transition. Rep. Ryan Zinke, a subcommittee member, publicly backed the Trump administration's move to relocate the Forest Service headquarters to Utah, arguing that "decisions about public lands should be made closer to the people they affect." Zinke has also highlighted appropriations-driven wins in his district, noting that he has "worked to secure millions in investments in rural water infrastructure" through the appropriations process, and celebrated the restoration of water flow through the St. Mary Siphon into the Milk River Canal as a tangible result of that work.
Meanwhile, Zinke has met with the Montana Petroleum Association, stating that "we are unleashing Montana energy" and emphasizing affordability, and has engaged with land conservation groups, highlighting the Montana Association of Land Trusts' work supporting wildlife corridors. That breadth reflects the competing pressures members of this subcommittee are managing as they write an EPA funding bill.
Subcommittee Chair Mike Simpson signaled the panel's active engagement with agency budget reviews just days before the hearing, noting that he "enjoyed having Chief Tom Schultz of the Forest Service in the Interior & Environment hearing testify on the Forest Service's FY27 budget." The EPA hearing follows that session as part of the subcommittee's broader FY27 budget review cycle.
Who's Lobbying and What They Want
The hearing draws on months of sustained lobbying activity targeting EPA appropriations and related environmental policy. Air quality districts have been among the most direct in their engagement with the budget process. The South Coast Air Quality Management District has filed quarterly disclosures specifically referencing the FY26 Interior and EPA appropriations bills, focusing on EPA funding levels tied to the Diesel Emissions Reduction Act and the Targeted Airshed program, spending roughly $58,000 to $59,000 per quarter throughout 2025. The Mohave Desert Air Quality Management District has filed parallel disclosures on the same bills at approximately $21,000 per quarter.
Dow Chemical Co. has maintained consistent lobbying on EPA regulations and energy efficiency, spending $60,000 per quarter through the fourth quarter of 2025 and into the first quarter of 2026.
On the renewable energy side, Leeward Renewable Energy LLC has been among the most active, spending $170,000 in the first quarter of 2026 alone on issues tied to land use, permitting, and environmental regulations affecting wind, solar, and battery storage development. Its fourth quarter 2025 spending reached $510,000.
The Bonneville Environmental Foundation has specifically flagged the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund in its disclosures, referencing both EPA annual appropriations and the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" as issues of concern, spending between $30,000 and $50,000 per quarter in 2025.
The Conservation Alliance has weighed in on Forest Service lands conservation policy, forestry legislation, and public lands sales, including the Fix Our Forests Act, with filings in the first quarter of 2025.
The Witness and the Stakes
Paige Hanson of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is the sole scheduled witness for the congressional budget hearing. As the administration's representative, Hanson will be expected to defend the EPA's budget request before a subcommittee whose Republican members have signaled support for energy development and administrative decentralization, and whose Democratic members, including Reps. Betty McCollum, Chellie Pingree, Rosa DeLauro, Josh Harder, and Jim Clyburn, are likely to press on funding cuts and regulatory rollbacks.
The EPA appropriations subcommittee has jurisdiction over programs that touch drinking water standards, air quality enforcement, Superfund cleanup, and climate-related grant programs, including the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which has already drawn lobbying attention. What the subcommittee chooses to fund, cut, or restrict in its FY27 bill will shape how those programs operate on the ground.
The hearing is scheduled for April 28 at 2008 Rayburn House Office Building. Rep. Simpson chairs the subcommittee, with Rep. Pingree serving as Ranking Member and Rep. Celeste Maloy as Vice Chair.
Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.