Why It Matters
The federal agency responsible for overseeing hardrock mining claims on public lands cannot confirm that those claims are held only by legally qualified parties, according to Critical Minerals: BLM Should Ensure Individuals and Businesses Meet Citizenship Requirements for Hardrock Mining Claims, published Oct. 16 by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
In a non-generalizable sample of 15 claimants that appeared to be business entities, GAO could not find evidence that seven, nearly half, were incorporated in the U.S. as required, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) was unable to determine whether they met that requirement because it did not have the necessary information.
The Big Picture
Critical minerals such as copper and lithium are vital to the U.S. economy and national security, and the U.S. relies on imported critical minerals to meet its needs. The administration and Congress have expressed concern about that reliance on foreign sources, and the President has called for expanding mineral production from federal lands.
BLM, an agency within the Department of the Interior, administers mining claims that grant the exclusive right to extract hardrock minerals from most federal lands.
Under U.S. mining laws, individuals holding such claims generally must be U.S. citizens, and business entities must be incorporated in a U.S. state or territory. Foreign entities are barred from holding claims outright, but their U.S.-incorporated subsidiaries may hold them, and claimants are not required to disclose to BLM whether they are a subsidiary of a foreign entity or receive foreign investment.
GAO was asked to review issues related to foreign entities' involvement in mining on federal lands, examining both the extent to which BLM collects and verifies citizenship information and how other major mineral-producing countries handle foreign investment in mining. The product page does not identify the congressional requesters by name or committee.
BLM collects basic identifying information from claimants under its regulations and guidance, but generally does not collect citizenship information and does not document whether claimants satisfy the legal requirements. BLM officials told GAO the agency rarely verifies claimants' citizenship, so BLM generally does not know whether claimants are qualified to hold mining claims.
Some mining operations on federal lands are supported by foreign investment, according to BLM officials. Together, those findings point to a systemic data gap: BLM has no routine mechanism to flag a claimant whose eligibility is in question.
By contrast, Australia and Canada, two of the world's top mineral-producing countries, collect detailed information on foreign investors in domestic businesses and can restrict or impose conditions on certain investments in mining; both countries also limit the ability of foreign state-owned enterprises and other foreign investors to acquire control of businesses involving critical minerals.
The comparison illustrates that peer nations have built oversight infrastructure that BLM currently lacks.
The Bottom Line
BLM received one recommendation: the Director of BLM should direct staff to collect citizenship information from mining claimants and document that they meet the citizenship requirements under U.S. mining laws to hold mining claims.
That recommendation is listed as open, with actions to satisfy its intent not yet taken and reportedly being planned. The report was published Oct. 6, and publicly released Oct. 16. The Department of the Interior did not provide comments on the report.
Until BLM acts, the agency lacks reasonable assurance that only qualified individuals and business entities hold mining claims that allow them to extract and profit from minerals produced on federal lands.
For congressional staff and advocates tracking critical-mineral policy, the open recommendation and the absence of any Interior response signal that oversight pressure may be the most direct lever available to move the agency toward compliance.
A linked invitation to track related legislative activity on Legis1
Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.
Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article
