Why It Matters

Carrier Global Corp. faces a regulatory squeeze as the Trump administration proposes relaxing EPA hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) restrictions that took effect in January 2025, creating compliance uncertainty for refrigeration equipment. Simultaneously, tariffs on imported HVAC components could raise equipment prices by 15-30%, pressuring consumer demand and manufacturing competitiveness. Meanwhile, expiring federal tax credits for energy-efficient home improvements threaten demand for Carrier’s residential products.

Carrier’s legislative strategy targets three fronts: securing passage of the FRIDGE Act to fund cold chain infrastructure; supporting the Heating and Cooling Relief Act to boost HVAC demand through expanded energy assistance; and advocating for restoration of R&D tax expensing and tariff exclusions on imported components.

By the Numbers

Carrier Global Corp. spent $544,373 on in-house lobbying during Q3 2025. Since 2019, the company has invested over $15.6 million in lobbying efforts, combining internal advocacy with external firms including Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Invariant LLC.

The company’s lobbying team consists of two in-house advocates: Kyle E. Gilley, who has represented Carrier since 2020 with energy and environmental policy expertise, and Clarence Kar-Lun Tong, who joined in 2023 with clean technology and manufacturing policy background.

The Agenda

Carrier Global Corp. focused Q3 lobbying on energy efficiency, environmental regulations, tax policy, and global food security—core areas aligned with its HVAC and refrigeration business.

The company is actively engaged on specific legislative initiatives. The FRIDGE Act supports Carrier’s cold chain advocacy by establishing USDA technical assistance programs for developing markets. The Heating and Cooling Relief Act expands low-income energy assistance, potentially driving demand for efficient HVAC systems.

Carrier’s focus areas included:

  • Energy & Infrastructure: Building efficiency, implementing the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and energy storage appropriations
  • Agriculture & Food Security: Promoting cold chain technology investments under the Global Food Security Act
  • Environmental Compliance: EPA engagement on HFC refrigerant transitions in HVAC systems
  • Tax & Trade Policy: Restoring R&D expensing and monitoring Section 301 tariffs affecting imported components

Broader Context

The global food security crisis is driving bipartisan attention to cold chain infrastructure. The FRIDGE Act advances federal support for cold chain development in emerging markets, creating export opportunities for refrigeration technology providers like Carrier.

On the regulatory front, Carrier faces shifting terrain on hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerant standards. The Trump administration is proposing regulatory relief on EPA’s 2023 HFC restrictions, creating both opportunities and uncertainties for manufacturers navigating compliance costs versus environmental standards.

Import tariffs on Chinese components affect HVAC equipment pricing and manufacturing margins, making Section 301 tariff exclusions a critical advocacy priority. Legal challenges to Trump administration climate funding freezes have created ongoing uncertainty around Inflation Reduction Act implementation, affecting building modernization incentives Carrier supports.

Between The Lines

Congressional activity directly supports several of Carrier’s core lobbying priorities. The bipartisan FRIDGE Act aims to establish USDA cold chain technical assistance programs for developing markets, while the Heating and Cooling Relief Act seeks to expand Low-Income Home Energy Assistance funding.

However, regulatory headwinds complicate Carrier’s environmental compliance work. The House Energy and Commerce Committee has criticized Department of Energy refrigeration standards, signaling ongoing partisan debate over federal regulation that directly impacts Carrier’s HFC transition advocacy.

Competitive Landscape

Johnson Controls International plc emerged as a direct competitor, with 2025 filings showing advocacy for HVAC manufacturing, indoor air quality, building modernization incentives, and energy efficiency tax deductions—mirroring Carrier’s focus areas almost entirely.

Owens Corning also lobbies extensively on building energy efficiency and sustainability as a potential policy ally for comprehensive building efficiency initiatives.

The Bottom Line

Carrier’s third quarter lobbying reflects genuine policy openings with congressional members championing cold chain development and energy assistance expansion. However, the regulatory environment presents countervailing forces as the Trump administration proposes relaxing HFC standards while tariff policies raise manufacturing costs. The company faces competitive pressure from Johnson Controls International, which lobbies on nearly identical issues, while navigating a transitional policy moment where consistent advocacy may yield incremental gains but faces structural headwinds.

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article