Why It Matters
Prometheus Hydrogen is making a high-stakes entry into federal advocacy at a moment when federal funding has been cancelled. The company hired King & Spalding LLP on January 1, 2025—its first-ever lobbying engagement.
The industry confronts destabilized federal funding following the Trump administration’s cancellation of $2.2 billion for West Coast hydrogen hubs, while simultaneously benefiting from over $110 billion in committed private investment. Prometheus Hydrogen’s team brings multi-front expertise: Steven M. Kupka offers energy infrastructure knowledge, James Michael Taylor provides trade policy experience as tariffs threaten supply chains, and Alexander Mann Crenshaw brings federal funding expertise.
The company’s advocacy will likely target three policy battlegrounds: protecting remaining hydrogen hub grants, preserving the 45V clean hydrogen production tax credit from the Inflation Reduction Act (which faces 2027 sunset), and addressing tariffs on steel, aluminum, and electrolyzers that threaten project economics.
By the Numbers
Prometheus Hydrogen is a newcomer to federal lobbying with no prior advocacy spending. The company hired King & Spalding LLP—which has filed over 1,500 lobbying disclosures since 2003—marking its first Washington engagement.
The Agenda
Prometheus Hydrogen launched with a broad mandate to advocate for hydrogen industry policies without identifying specific legislation. However, the congressional environment suggests clear priorities: H.R.2545—the Financing Our Energy Future Act would allow hydrogen projects to access capital markets as Publicly Traded Partnerships, while H.R.1594, the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Act, could create hydrogen demand as a feedstock.
The most pressing issue involves protecting federal funding. The DOE’s Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs program has become politically volatile, with billions in West Coast project cancellations. The 45V clean hydrogen tax credit—a cornerstone of industry economics—faces implementation questions and 2027 sunset.
Trade barriers present another challenge. Tariffs on steel, aluminum, and equipment imports could disrupt electrolyzer supply chains, explaining why King & Spalding assembled expertise spanning trade, appropriations, and energy infrastructure.
Broader Context
Congress is reshaping hydrogen policy amid intense partisan debate. The administration’s cancellation of over $1 billion for regional hubs—including California’s ARCHES hub and Washington’s Pacific Northwest hub—has created uncertainty around federal support.
The 45V Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit remains politically vulnerable despite bipartisan protection. Representative Chris Deluzio criticized Treasury guidance as overly restrictive, while 21 House Republicans opposed eliminating the incentives. Senator John Cornyn indicated rescuing the credits remains viable.
Competitive Landscape
The company faces significant competitive pressure. Highly Innovative Fuels spends $70,000 quarterly on hydrogen advocacy, while LanzaTech Inc. lobbies heavily on tax credit implementation. Other players including Bloom Energy Corp. and Tallgrass Energy Partners LP actively engage Congress on hydrogen policy.
The Bottom Line
Recent funding cancellations and the 2027 tax credit expiration have destabilized sector economics, though bipartisan support and industrial demand provide protection. The company’s King & Spalding team is equipped for multi-front advocacy challenges ahead, competing against well-resourced rivals like Highly Innovative Fuels and LanzaTech in shaping hydrogen policy.
Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.
Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article