Why It Matters

The Keeping Deposits Local Act cleared the House floor vote with 405 votes in favor and zero against, a result that is genuinely rare in the current Congress. The bill modifies federal rules governing reciprocal deposits, replacing a flat cap with a tiered system that allows banks to exempt a percentage of those deposits from brokered deposit rules based on their size.

The practical effect: community banks, minority depository institutions, CDFIs, and rural lenders gain more flexibility to keep capital circulating locally, funding small businesses, homebuyers, and nonprofits. The legislation draws a direct line from the 2023 regional bank failures, which exposed how quickly deposits can flee smaller institutions.

The Big Picture

The bill sailed through the House Financial Services Committee in September 2025 with unanimous support, and the House Majority Leader slotted it for floor consideration the week of May 13, 2026. The Senate companion, S. 2757, was introduced on September 10, 2025 by Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) and Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) and currently sits in the Senate Banking Committee.

The House bill is also listed as a related measure to the Main Street Act (H.R. 6955), a broader community banking reform package reported out of committee in April 2026, signaling a coordinated 119th Congress push to ease regulatory burdens on smaller financial institutions.

Partisan Perspectives

The vote produced no daylight between the parties. Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH-3), the House sponsor, tied the bill directly to underserved communities: "This bill will free up capital for MDIs, CDFIs, and rural banks to lend to small businesses, homebuyers, and nonprofits."

Rep. Dan Meuser (R-PA-9) framed it as long-overdue regulatory cleanup: "This bill ensures that reciprocal deposits, a stable, relationship-based funding source, are treated as the safe deposits they are."

On the Senate side, Rounds pointed to the 2023 bank failures as the catalyst: "This legislation removes the outdated cap on reciprocal deposits for community banks. That flexibility will help South Dakota banks keep deposits local and strengthens the resilience of our financial system, a lesson reinforced by the bank failures in 2023."

Warner kept the focus on local economies: "This bipartisan bill helps ensure community and regional banks can keep more capital working in their local economies."

No formal Statement of Administration Policy from the Trump White House has been publicly issued on this bill. Republican leadership's decision to schedule the legislation for a floor vote, combined with 200 Republican yes votes and zero no votes, signals no visible opposition from the administration, though no official position has been confirmed.

There were no defections. Zero Republicans and zero Democrats voted against the measure.

Political Stakes

For House Republicans, the vote is a clean win on the regulatory relief front without any of the political friction that typically accompanies financial services legislation. For Democrats, supporting a bill that explicitly benefits MDIs and CDFIs allows them to point to tangible community investment outcomes. Neither side had to give anything up to get here, which is precisely why the vote looked the way it did.

The harder test comes in the Senate, where S. 2757 remains in committee. The Senate Banking Committee has not yet scheduled a markup. With bipartisan Senate sponsors including Warner, Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL), Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH), the Senate version has the coalition it needs. Whether it gets floor time is a different question.

The Bottom Line

A 405-0 House floor vote on any piece of legislation in this Congress is notable. The Keeping Deposits Local Act benefits from a simple premise, a clear problem rooted in recent memory, and a solution that costs neither party politically.

The bill fits squarely into a broader 119th Congress pattern of incremental regulatory relief for smaller financial institutions, with the Main Street Act waiting in the wings as the larger vehicle.

The immediate obstacle is Senate floor time. If the Senate Banking Committee moves S. 2757 through markup, the path to enactment is short. If it stalls, the House vote becomes a political data point rather than a policy outcome.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.