Why It Matters

Pacific Fusion Corp., a fusion energy company with a reported $1 billion investment in New Mexico, has filed a lobbying registration disclosure with federal authorities, bringing on Greenberg Traurig LLP to navigate energy and defense policy in Washington.

The registration, signed June 10, 2026, marks Pacific Fusion's first known federal lobbying effort.

Fusion energy is moving from laboratory to legislative priority. Pacific Fusion's entry into federal lobbying signals the company is positioning itself to engage directly with Congress on policy that could shape the sector's commercial future.

The company's dual focus on energy and defense issues suggests it may be pursuing both civilian energy policy and national security-related contracts or regulatory pathways. This is a first-time lobbying registration for the company.

By The Numbers

The new lobbying registration disclosure lists no financial figures, as is standard for initial registrations. No historical lobbying expenditure data is available for Pacific Fusion Corp., consistent with this being a new entrant.

The lobbying team at Greenberg Traurig consists of two registered lobbyists:

  • Dan Sennott, Shareholder and Co-Chair of Greenberg Traurig's National Security Group, brings direct committee experience. He served on the House Armed Services Committee across the 114th, 115th, and 116th Congresses.
  • Misha Lehrer, Senior Director at the firm, previously worked for Sen. Christopher Murphy (D-CT).

The pairing covers both the defense and Senate Democratic outreach angles relevant to Pacific Fusion's registered issue areas.

The Agenda

The federal lobbying registration lists two broad issue areas: Energy/Nuclear and Defense. No specific legislation is identified in the disclosure, and no specific issues are described in the filing's issue text fields.

Given the absence of specific bill references or issue descriptions, the precise contours of Pacific Fusion's agenda are not yet public. The broad issue codes filed, however, point toward nuclear energy policy, defense procurement or contracting, and potentially the regulatory frameworks governing fusion energy development.

Broader Context

Pacific Fusion Corp. was publicly cited by Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) in March 2026, when he highlighted the company's $1 billion investment in Central New Mexico at a manufacturing and innovation expo. Heinrich framed Pacific Fusion alongside other clean energy investments as evidence that New Mexico is "becoming one of the best places in our country to build our clean energy future," connecting the company's presence to federal legislation, including the Infrastructure Law, CHIPS and Science Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act.

Heinrich's remarks placed Pacific Fusion in the same category as Kairos Power and Arcosa, framing the company as central to the state's advanced energy identity. That kind of public profile, ahead of a formal lobbying registration, suggests the company already has some degree of congressional visibility.

The defense angle is also notable. Fusion energy has increasingly been framed in national security terms by members of Congress, particularly in the context of competition with China. That framing maps directly onto Pacific Fusion's decision to register under both Energy/Nuclear and Defense issue codes, and onto the background of lead lobbyist Dan Sennott, whose career is rooted in national security work and House Armed Services Committee experience.

Between The Lines

Congressional engagement on fusion energy has been active in the period leading up to this registration.

Rep. Carol D. Miller (R-WV) has been publicly promoting the Fusion Advanced Manufacturing Parity Act, which would extend the 45X advanced manufacturing tax credit to fusion energy components. In an April 2026 post, she cited China's scaling investment in fusion as a reason for urgency, framing the bill as both an economic and national security measure.

On the workforce side, a bipartisan bill introduced by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-CA) in August 2025 would authorize National Science Foundation and Department of Energy activities to support a fusion energy workforce. Lofgren has also framed fusion explicitly as a defense issue, producing a video titled "America's Fusion Race Against China" in September 2025 that linked fusion energy development to national security competition.

Lofgren has also held direct meetings with fusion energy companies. In December 2025, she noted a meeting with Inertia Enterprises to discuss advancing American leadership in fusion and how Congress can support innovation in the field. The pattern of member engagement with individual fusion companies is the kind of congressional environment Pacific Fusion is now seeking to access through its Greenberg Traurig team.

Competitive Landscape

Pacific Fusion is not the only fusion energy company cultivating a Washington presence. Lofgren's meeting with Inertia Enterprises and Heinrich's mention of Kairos Power alongside Pacific Fusion indicate that multiple companies in the advanced nuclear and fusion space are actively engaging Congress. The Fusion Industry Association also appears in the record, with Rep. Miller addressing the group directly about her manufacturing parity legislation. The lobbying activities report for Pacific Fusion does not identify specific competitors or their lobbying positions.

The Bottom Line

Pacific Fusion Corp.'s federal lobbying registration disclosure puts a well-resourced, defense-connected lobbying team behind a company that already has some congressional visibility. The dual Energy/Nuclear and Defense issue registration, combined with a lead lobbyist whose career centered on the House Armed Services Committee, points toward a strategy that treats fusion energy as both a commercial and national security play. The specific legislative asks remain undisclosed for now, as is typical at the registration stage.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.