Why It Matters

The Human Rights Campaign Equality Votes PAC has concentrated nearly four-fifths of its reported independent expenditures on supporting California state Sen. Scott Wiener in California's open-seat 11th Congressional District. The LGBTQ advocacy organization's electoral committee has focused almost entirely on supporting Democratic candidates, with Wiener receiving the overwhelming majority of its spending ahead of the Nov. 3 general election. ​

Wiener faces San Francisco Supervisor Connie Chan in a Democrat-versus-Democrat contest to succeed retiring Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). The race has attracted substantial outside spending from organizations supporting both candidates, reflecting divisions within San Francisco's Democratic coalition over housing, economic policy and other issues. The PAC's intervention adds organized LGBTQ advocacy to a contest already drawing support from business interests, technology-sector donors and labor organizations.

The Human Rights Campaign Equality Votes PAC is affiliated with the Human Rights Campaign, a national LGBTQ advocacy organization. The PAC describes its mission as mobilizing "equality voters," and in a 2024 announcement, it said it sought to "educate, persuade, and mobilize" voters in Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina and Wisconsin.

The PAC's latest campaign supporting Wiener emphasizes his legislative record on LGBTQ rights, housing and health care affordability. Announced Oct. 22, the digital and mail campaign features an advertisement titled "Scott Made Room for Us," highlighting Wiener's work on housing construction, insulin affordability and protections for LGBTQ Californians. The campaign illustrates the PAC's effort to connect its LGBTQ equality agenda with broader affordability issues.

What It Spent

The Human Rights Campaign Equality Votes PAC has reportedly spent approximately $1.31 million in independent expenditures this cycle, with about $1.02 million supporting Wiener, representing nearly 78% of the total. The remaining spending is concentrated on other Democratic candidates, with only nominal expenditures opposing Republicans.

The committee's reported spending includes:

Advertisement
  • Scott Wiener, California's 11th District: $1,021,718 supporting Wiener in the open-seat race against Connie Chan.
  • Cait Conley, New York's 17th District: $125,000 supporting Conley against Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) in a Toss-up race.
  • Joanna Mendoza, Arizona's 6th District: $125,000 supporting Mendoza against Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ).
  • Marni von Wilpert, California's 48th District: $40,000 supporting von Wilpert in the open-seat race.
  • Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL): $25 opposing Fine in the 2025 special election.

The reported spending totals require final reconciliation against the FEC's original and amended independent-expenditure notices. A separate campaign-finance compilation corroborates approximately $1.02 million in support for Wiener.

Who Funds It

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is the Human Rights Campaign Equality Votes PAC's largest reported contributor, providing $1 million, or about 98% of the committee's reported $1.02 million in receipts through Oct. 14.

James Costos and Morgan W. Cox III are the next-largest individual contributors identified in the supplied records, each giving $2,500. The Human Rights Campaign, the PAC's parent organization, reportedly contributed $2,887 across multiple smaller transfers. The committee's funding is therefore heavily concentrated in Bloomberg's contribution, with substantially smaller amounts coming from other individuals and its parent organization.

The committee also reportedly held $1.04 million in cash on hand and recorded $106,000 in disbursements through Oct. 14. Those figures cover an earlier reporting period than the PAC's latest independent-expenditure notices and should not be compared as if they reflected the same cutoff date.

The Ad Buy

The PAC's spending supporting Wiener was concentrated in October, with Renegade Advisors LLC handling its reported advertising expenditures.

The PAC's Oct. 22 campaign announcement confirmed a $1 million digital and mail campaign supporting Wiener. The organization said the ads would run on connected television, streaming audio, social media, and digital pre-roll platforms, reaching about 400,000 voters in the district. Do not add the announced campaign budget to the independent-expenditure totals without confirming whether the same advertising activity is already included.

Other Spenders in the Same Races

In California's 11th District, Abundant Future has reportedly spent $4.34 million, including $1.88 million supporting Wiener, $1.58 million opposing Chan and $888,000 opposing former primary candidate Saikat Chakrabarti. GrowUSA has reportedly spent $2.82 million, including $1.45 million supporting Wiener and $1.38 million opposing Chan. SF for All has reportedly spent $1.33 million, including $1.14 million supporting Chan and $186,000 opposing Wiener and Chakrabarti.

The Human Rights Campaign Equality Votes PAC's approximately $1.02 million supporting Wiener adds to the contest's substantial outside spending. However, it is not the largest committee supporting him by reported expenditure amount. Abundant Future and GrowUSA have each spent more to support his candidacy, according to the original draft figures.

In New York's 17th District, Congressional Leadership Fund (CLF) has reportedly spent $8.73 million opposing Conley, Safety & Affordability PAC Inc. has spent $1.83 million split evenly between opposing Conley and supporting Lawler, and House Majority PAC (HMP) has spent $1.66 million opposing Lawler.

The Human Rights Campaign Equality Votes PAC's reported $125,000 supporting Conley represents a smaller share of the outside expenditures in a contest where national organizations have committed substantially more. The competing committees' totals require confirmation against current FEC filings.

You can explore more about this committee's filings at Legis1.com.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article