Why it Matters

Congress will need to grapple with whether to reform or scrap Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the 1996 law that shields tech platforms from liability for content on their sites. That's because two back-to-back jury verdicts found Meta liable for harms to children. One jury awarded $375 million in New Mexico, and another in California awarded $6 million. It is an issue lawmaker have dodge for years but will be front and center at the Senate Judiciary Committee's scheduled hearing on May 13.

This hearing is a direct response to those verdicts and to Meta's subsequent legal move to use Section 230 to undo them.

The stakes are significant. If Congress acts, it could fundamentally alter the liability framework that has governed the internet for three decades. If it doesn't, the courts may remain the only venue for accountability — a patchwork approach that tech companies, child safety advocates, and state attorneys general have all, in different ways, found unsatisfying.

What Drove the Verdicts

On March 24, 2026, a New Mexico state court jury found Meta liable for violating New Mexico's Unfair Practices Act, concluding the company failed to safeguard children from sexual predators on its platforms and ordering roughly $375 million in civil penalties. The following day, a Los Angeles County jury found Meta and Google negligent in the design of their apps and liable for addicting a young user, awarding $6 million in damages. TikTok and Snap settled with the plaintiff before trial.

The California verdict was notable for what the jury found: that platforms were liable not for third-party content, but for their own design choices. That distinction matters enormously for Section 230, which has traditionally been read to immunize platforms from liability for content posted by users — not necessarily for the platforms' own product design decisions.

One day before the Senate Judiciary hearing was announced, Meta asked the Los Angeles court to set aside the verdict, arguing it was shielded by Section 230. Google filed a similar motion. The move illustrated precisely the dynamic that appears to have prompted the hearing: if Section 230 can be used to overturn jury verdicts, legislation may be the only durable path to accountability.

The Legislative Response

Roll Call reported in April that the verdicts were energizing bipartisan legislative efforts on Capitol Hill. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ranking Member Dick Durbin (D-IL) are among the co-sponsors of a bill introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) that would sunset Section 230 after two years. The bill has drawn support from a group of Judiciary Committee members, a rare alignment in a Congress that has struggled to move tech legislation.

Immediately after the California verdict, committee members Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) called on Congress to pass legislation requiring social media companies to design platforms with children's safety in mind.

Industry Lobbying

The platforms most directly implicated by the verdicts have been active in Washington. In the First Quarter of 2026 alone, Meta spent $7,260,000 on lobbying, with filings explicitly listing Section 230, youth safety, and platform integrity among the issues lobbied. Amazon reported $4,440,000 in First Quarter 2026 lobbying that included Section 230 reform and kids' online safety. Google's First Quarter 2026 filings totaled $2,940,000, covering intermediary liability and content moderation. TikTok spent $1,130,000 in the same period on issues including algorithm security, content moderation, and online safety.

Fox Corp. has also lobbied on Section 230 across multiple quarters, spending $1,180,000 in First Quarter 2026 on issues including Section 230, First Amendment concerns, and online privacy. News Corp. reported $200,000 in First Quarter 2026 lobbying specifically referencing Section 230 and the First Amendment.

On the reform side, the Center for Countering Digital Hate has lobbied on the Sunset Section 230 Act (S. 3546), and Airbnb's First Quarter 2026 filing explicitly listed S. 3546 as a lobbied bill. Internet Works, a coalition of smaller platforms, has lobbied in opposition to Section 230 changes, spending $50,000 in First Quarter 2026.

The Committee

The hearing is chaired by Grassley, with Durbin serving as ranking member. The full committee roster includes senators who have been among the most vocal on social media regulation from both parties, including Graham, Blackburn, Blumenthal, Josh Hawley (R-MO), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), and Ted Cruz (R-TX). The breadth of the bipartisan co-sponsorship on the Graham Section 230 sunset bill suggests the hearing is less about whether to act and more about what form that action should take.

Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.