Why It Matters
McCormick & Co. Inc. faces an existential supply chain crisis, with tariffs estimated to cost the spice giant $70 million in 2025. The company sources 60 percent of U.S. spices from countries now facing tariff walls, making Congressional proposals like the "No Tariffs on Groceries Act" crucial for its survival.
McCormick’s shift to in-house lobbying signals this isn’t peripheral—the company is investing directly in congressional outreach alongside a bipartisan coalition of food companies warning that current trade policy threatens supply chains and consumer prices. With legal challenges to presidential tariff authority pending at the Supreme Court, McCormick’s advocacy aims to shape both legislative and judicial outcomes.
By the Numbers
McCormick spent $80,000 on in-house lobbying in the third quarter 2025, marking a strategic shift from external firms. The company has filed 29 disclosure reports totaling $740,000 since 2017, with $235,000 spent in 2025 alone through in-house efforts.
Previously, McCormick relied on LobbyDC.com LLC for 18 filings worth $465,000. The Q3 filing was conducted by Paul B. Nolan, an in-house lobbyist focused exclusively on McCormick since April 2025. This internal approach signals the company views tariffs and taxes as core strategic priorities requiring direct control.
The Agenda
McCormick is lobbying on two critical issues: an "upcoming tax debate" and tariff-related policies. The company has historically focused on taxation (14 instances) and trade (10 instances), with recent emphasis on tariffs affecting its global supply chain.
McCormick’s advocacy aligns with congressional efforts to restrict food tariffs. Congress is debating the "No Tariffs on Groceries Act," requiring congressional approval before imposing food duties. Lawmakers have also questioned whether recent tariffs on Canada and Mexico violate the USMCA trade agreement.
On taxation, McCormick engages in discussions surrounding comprehensive legislation like HR 1 – One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signaling potential major corporate tax changes.
Broader Context
McCormick’s lobbying reflects acute pressures reshaping food imports. The spice industry sources 60% of U.S. supplies internationally with no domestic alternatives, leaving companies vulnerable to tariffs as high as 50% on certain countries.
Rep. Haley Stevens introduced the "No Tariffs on Groceries Act" with bipartisan support, while Senator Amy Klobuchar led colleagues warning tariffs threaten food security. McCormick joins a coalition including the National Restaurant Association and Kansas Farm Bureau pressing for exemptions.
Between The Lines
Congress is actively addressing McCormick’s concerns through multiple channels. The Senate Finance Committee held hearings on trade policy, while bills directly tackle the company’s issues—the No Tariffs on Groceries Act and H.Con.Res.25 challenging USMCA violations.
Key lawmakers are vocal supporters. Rep. Haley Stevens introduced grocery tariff legislation after highlighting price increases, while Sen. Amy Klobuchar urged tariff reconsideration for food security.
Competitive Landscape
McCormick leads a broad coalition lobbying against tariffs. The Kansas Farm Bureau focuses on USMCA and retaliatory tariffs affecting agriculture, while the National Restaurant Association addresses supply chain disruptions. Lowe’s Companies lobbies on broader trade resilience issues.
This farm-to-retail coalition amplifies arguments that current policies cause widespread economic disruption, creating significant cross-sector congressional pressure.
The Bottom Line
McCormick’s $80,000 third quarter lobbying investment targets two existential threats: tariffs costing $70 million annually and tax uncertainty. The company’s timing aligns with congressional momentum, as multiple bills seek to require approval before food tariffs take effect.
Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.
Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article