Why it Matters

Bundy Baking Solutions is making its first foray into federal lobbying amid unprecedented uncertainty over tariff policy. The global baking equipment manufacturer retained Ann Aquillo Consulting LLC specifically to address “tariffs and tariff policy implementation.” This marks a strategic shift for the family-owned company, which can no longer rely solely on industry associations as Congress debates sweeping changes to trade policy.

By the Numbers

  • Lobbying Team: Single lobbyist Ann K. Aquillo handles the account
  • Historical Spending: This is Bundy’s first federal lobbying registration
  • Effective Date: July 4, 2025
  • Initial Budget: $0 reported (common for mid-quarter filings)
  • Aquillo’s Experience: Previously lobbied for Transportation Research Center Inc. ($160,000 between 2023-2025) and Oberlin College

Broader Context

The 119th Congress is actively debating multiple tariff-related bills. Manufacturing companies face significant cost pressures from potential policy changes. Steel and aluminum tariffs directly impact baking equipment manufacturers like Bundy. Congressional hearings have highlighted how “tariff uncertainty is killing companies” according to witness testimony. The administration has outlined an assertive trade strategy that creates planning challenges for global manufacturers.

The Agenda

Bundy is lobbying specifically on tariff policy implementation. The company manufactures metal-based baking equipment and relies on global supply chains. Raw material costs from steel and aluminum tariffs directly affect their business model. No specific legislation is mentioned in their registration, but Congress is considering bills that would expand presidential tariff authority or require legislative approval for trade actions.

Competitive Landscape

The American Bakers Association spent $20,000 in Q2 2025 lobbying on the “impact of proposed tariffs on the commercial baking industry.” The association is also working to establish a “Congressional Commercial Baking Caucus” to provide a dedicated forum for industry concerns. Bundy’s direct lobbying complements these association-level efforts with company-specific advocacy.

Between The Lines

Congress is considering conflicting approaches to tariff policy. The H.R.735 – United States Reciprocal Trade Act would expand presidential tariff authority. Opposition bills like the H.R.2888 – Stopping a Rogue President on Trade Act and S.348 – STABLE Trade Policy Act would require congressional approval. Key hearings include sessions with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Members remain divided: Sen. Chuck Grassley called tariffs a “stupid policy,” while Rep. Ralph Norman argued that tariffs motivate American manufacturing. Rep. Gwen Moore warned tariffs will “disrupt the entire food supply chain.”

The Bottom Line

Bundy’s lobbying debut reflects how trade policy uncertainty is forcing manufacturers to engage directly with Congress. The company joins a broader industry effort to ensure policymakers understand the real-world impacts of tariff decisions on supply chains and costs. Success will depend on navigating a deeply polarized debate over America’s trade future.

All data used in this article came from Legis1. Request a demo to learn more!

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article