Why it matters

The Global Business Alliance continues its sophisticated tax advocacy with a specialized consultant. The $50,000 payment to Alan E. Pasetsky extends a relationship dating to February 2022. GBA has paid Pasetsky $636,000 across 15 disclosures, focusing exclusively on technical tax matters.

By the numbers

  • Current engagement: $50,000 for Q2 2025 lobbying activities
  • Historical spending: GBA has spent $30,060,254 across 79 disclosures since 2003
  • Pasetsky’s role: Solo practitioner specializing in corporate and international tax
  • Previous major firms: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ($2.4M, 67 disclosures), OGR ($1.99M, 38 disclosures)

Broader Context

Congress faces competing visions for international taxation affecting foreign investment. Two key bills illustrate the stakes: the S.409 – No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act takes an enforcement approach, while S.1605 – International Competition for American Jobs Act aims to enhance U.S. competitiveness. These proposals directly impact how foreign-owned companies operate in America.

The Agenda

The latest filing targets “Corporate provisions of OBBBA as well as section 899 advocacy.” Previous work focused on interest expense limitations, R&D expensing, bonus depreciation, and international tax regimes. Pasetsky’s expertise centers on Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax and Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax provisions.

Competitive Landscape

GBA operates in a crowded advocacy space. Large multinational corporations, major business associations, and law firms all lobby on similar issues. Foreign governments also advocate through diplomatic channels for fair treatment of their companies. This competition makes specialized representation crucial for GBA’s unique perspective as the voice of inbound investors.

Between The Lines

S.409 would treat certain foreign corporations “managed and controlled” in the U.S. as domestic entities. This could create major tax liabilities for foreign-owned companies with substantial U.S. management. S.1605 proposes a “safe harbor” for BEAT payments already subject to adequate foreign tax. The House Ways and Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee are actively debating tax competitiveness versus base erosion prevention.

The Bottom Line

GBA’s continued investment in specialized tax lobbying reflects the high stakes of current congressional debates. The outcome will determine whether U.S. tax policy encourages or penalizes foreign direct investment. With $636,000 paid to Pasetsky since 2022, GBA is making a substantial bet on technical expertise over political connections.

Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article