Why It Matters
MasterBrand Cabinets LLC is making its first federal lobbying push to navigate antitrust scrutiny of its proposed merger with American Woodmark. The FTC issued a Second Request in November 2025, signaling serious competition concerns that could block the deal.
The company’s strategic choice of Miller Strategies LLC and specifically James Tyler Grimm—who spent 15 years in Congress as Chief Policy and Strategy Counsel for the House Judiciary Committee—reflects the high stakes involved.
The political landscape offers both opportunity and peril. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senator Tommy Tuberville have championed tariffs protecting the domestic cabinet industry’s 250,000 jobs, while Rep. Ro Khanna has criticized plant closures from industry consolidation, creating Democratic opposition the company must address.
By the Numbers
MasterBrand Cabinets LLC registered Miller Strategies LLC in April 2024. The firm has reported over $75 million in lobbying expenditures since 2017, representing clients including Apple Inc. and Broadcom Ltd..
The lobbying team includes Jeffrey Miller, who brings M&A experience across multiple sectors, and James Tyler Grimm, whose 15 years in the House and role as Chief Policy Counsel for the Judiciary Committee provides crucial antitrust expertise and Republican access.
The Agenda
MasterBrand’s lobbying effort focuses exclusively on antitrust, labor, and workplace issues surrounding its proposed merger with American Woodmark. The company must navigate FTC scrutiny while addressing competing political narratives.
On one side, lawmakers like Senator Tommy Tuberville are pushing tariffs to protect 250,000 domestic cabinet manufacturing jobs, creating space for MasterBrand to frame consolidation as necessary industry strengthening. However, Rep. Ro Khanna has highlighted facility closures, including 246 jobs lost at the Colton, California facility, complicating the company’s messaging on job preservation.
Broader Context
The cabinet industry faces mounting pressure from imports, which reached $3.7 billion in 2024—double the amount from a decade ago. This backdrop energized congressional action, with Trump announcing 50% tariffs on imported kitchen cabinets.
Despite this protectionist climate, MasterBrand faces significant regulatory obstacles. The FTC’s Second Request signals serious antitrust concerns, while Democrats criticize consolidation-related job losses.
Between The Lines
Congressional divisions create a complex landscape for MasterBrand. Protectionist momentum from Republican leaders who joined cabinet industry CEOs contrasts with Democratic resistance led by Rep. Khanna’s criticism of facility closures.
Grimm’s House Judiciary Committee background becomes crucial given the panel’s antitrust jurisdiction and the regulatory headwinds facing the merger.
Competitive Landscape
While MasterBrand’s registration is the only specific disclosure focused on the American Woodmark merger, broader industry advocacy around trade protection is evident. Cabinet CEOs participated in discussions with congressional leaders on protecting domestic jobs.
However, labor advocates and competitors likely oppose consolidation narratives, as evidenced by ongoing criticism of facility closures.
The Bottom Line
MasterBrand’s first lobbying effort targets a narrow but high-stakes objective: clearing regulatory hurdles for its American Woodmark merger. The company must balance protectionist allies who support strengthening domestic manufacturers against foreign competition with Democrats skeptical of consolidation’s job impact. Success depends on leveraging Grimm’s congressional expertise to navigate FTC scrutiny while aligning with the Trump administration’s cabinet tariff measures.
Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.
Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article