Why it matters
Randolph College is pursuing science building funding and has invested in federal lobbying to modernize its Martin Science Building. The Virginia liberal arts college hired Lincoln Policy Group in mid-2023 and has spent $50,000 so far to press for federal support amid strong competition for STEM grants.
By the numbers
Randolph College has reported $50,000 in lobbying expenditures since July 2023, handled entirely by external lobbyists at Lincoln Policy Group. The three-person team listed in disclosures includes:
- Blanche Meyers Lambert Lincoln (former U.S. Senator)
- Hannah Lambiotte Smith (former Senate staffer)
- Craig Felner (veteran lobbyist)
Agenda and strategy
Randolph College seeks federal funding for “scientific equipment, technology and instrumentation for the Martin Science Building.” That focused objective has been consistent across all seven lobbying disclosures since 2023; no single bill was named as the target. The college’s approach is a focused advocacy push to differentiate itself in a crowded grant environment.
Broader context
Congress has shown bipartisan interest in supporting research infrastructure and STEM education, with bills and hearings addressing federal lab capacity and educational programs. Recent measures such as related legislative proposals and hearings demonstrate Congress’s commitment.
Competitive landscape
Smaller colleges like Randolph compete with many institutions—recent awards include more than $2.2 million for Tougaloo College and $650,000 for the University of Toledo—making clear differentiation important when pursuing federal grants. Randolph’s continued investment and use of experienced lobbyists show a deliberate strategy to position its project for funding.
Bottom line
The college’s sustained lobbying reflects strategic planning rather than desperation: experienced counsel, a clear ask, and a favorable (if competitive) political climate for STEM funding create reasonable prospects for success. Still, the competition for federal science building funding is intense.
Spot something wrong? Report an issue with this article