Why it Matters
The Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee is set to vote Thursday on H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, a bill that would end years of regulatory ambiguity over who governs the digital asset market. The stakes are significant: the bill would divide jurisdiction over digital commodities between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, potentially reshaping how trillions of dollars in crypto assets are traded, regulated, and taxed in the United States.
The crypto industry has spent more than $21 million lobbying on H.R. 3633 and related digital asset legislation in the past year, a figure that reflects just how much is riding on the committee's decision.
The Bill and What It Would Do
H.R. 3633 passed the House on July 17, 2025, by a vote of 294-134, a bipartisan margin that reflected unusual consensus on a contentious topic. The bill was introduced by Rep. J. Hill (R-AR) and referred to the Senate Banking Committee in September 2025.
The legislation establishes three categories of digital assets and assigns a regulator to each. The CFTC would have primary jurisdiction over digital commodity transactions, while the SEC would govern certain broker-dealer activity on alternative trading systems. Digital assets on "mature" blockchains, those that have achieved decentralized control, would be exempt from SEC registration requirements if annual sales fall below a specified threshold.
The bill also includes provisions banning the Federal Reserve from offering certain products directly to individuals and prohibiting the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, provisions that have drawn separate attention from financial regulators and civil liberties advocates.
Just three days before the scheduled committee vote, the Senate Banking Committee released a 309-page draft of its own version of the legislation, internally titled the Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2026. CoinDesk reported the bill had been circulating in industry circles before lawmakers made it public.
Regulatory Action Set the Stage
The committee's move did not happen in a vacuum. Earlier this year, the SEC issued a formal interpretation clarifying how federal securities laws apply to certain crypto assets, and the CFTC joined that interpretation to provide parallel guidance under the Commodity Exchange Act. The SEC's release specifically noted that the action "complements Congressional endeavors to codify a comprehensive market structure framework into statute." The joint interpretation named 16 digital assets it classified as digital commodities.
Around the same time, the CFTC withdrew guidance that had imposed stricter requirements on regulated entities dealing with digital assets, and adopted no-action relief permitting futures commission merchants to engage with digital assets. That regulatory rollback created pressure on Congress to fill the gap with statute.
A parallel legislative track added urgency. The Senate Agriculture Committee, which has jurisdiction over the CFTC, released its own competing draft that builds off of H.R. 3633 by defining digital commodities and establishing consumer protections. That Boozman-Booker draft created a two-committee dynamic that increased pressure on Senate Banking to act.
Reuters framed the upcoming vote as consideration of a "long-awaited" crypto bill that "would clarify financial regulators' jurisdiction over the burgeoning digital asset sector, potentially boosting digital asset adoption" if signed into law.
The Money Behind the Push
The lobbying campaign behind H.R. 3633 is among the most concentrated in recent financial services history. Coinbase leads all spenders with more than $5.5 million in disclosed lobbying expenditures on digital asset market structure issues over the past year, with filings explicitly naming H.R. 3633 across multiple quarters. The company's First Quarter 2026 filing lists the bill alongside implementation of the GENIUS Act, the stablecoin legislation signed into law earlier this year.
Kraken reported $1.86 million in lobbying spend, with its most recent filing referencing "draft senate market structure digital asset legislation" directly. The Blockchain Association spent $2.39 million across five quarters on decentralized finance and digital asset regulation. Paradigm Operations LP, a crypto-focused investment firm, filed a dedicated $400,000 disclosure in the Fourth Quarter of 2025 listing H.R. 3633 as its sole lobbying issue.
Ripple Labs spent $940,000 across multiple filings, with its most recent disclosure referencing the Senate Banking Committee's own draft, the Responsible Financial Innovation Act. Jump Crypto Holdings reported $630,000, with filings citing H.R. 3633 alongside legislation to modernize the federal tax code for digital assets. The Crypto Council for Innovation specifically named H.R. 3633 in its First Quarter 2026 filing alongside the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.
Fintech firm SoFi Technologies spent $680,000 on digital asset market structure issues, while DB USA Corp., the U.S. arm of Deutsche Bank, filed $180,000 in First Quarter 2026 lobbying disclosures listing H.R. 3633 alongside broader banking regulatory topics.
The Bottom Line
The Crypto Times reported that the draft's release was accompanied by ongoing tensions including stablecoin debates, banking sector concerns, and questions about Trump's crypto ties, all cited as factors complicating the bill's trajectory.
The committee is chaired by Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) serving as ranking member. Warren has been among the most vocal critics of crypto deregulation in the Senate, and her posture heading into Thursday's markup will be closely watched as a signal of whether Democrats on the panel will offer amendments or resistance.
Access the Legis1 platform for comprehensive political news, data, and insights.